2022 Undergraduate Research Symposium
Symposium by ForagerOne
    Skip navigation
  • arrow_back_ios
    Exit Event
  • Welcome Page
  • Presentations
  • Live Sessions
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Prediction and Integration in Listening Comprehension: A Pilot Study of Autism



Voiceover

Presenter(s)

Abigail Driggers

Presentation accessible on Google Drive:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hQHj2xzF_kQeVC1RURTDkrNpRa7Irgk1/view?usp=sharing

Abstract or Description

Difficulties in reading comprehension, of which listening comprehension plays a vital role, has been implicated in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Theory of mind ability is also correlated with reading comprehension. Some evidence suggests that difficulty in integrating information may impact listening comprehension, but a relatively new theory suggests that struggles to make predictions could contribute to language difficulties in autism. Integration and prediction have not been compared in listening comprehension in ASD. The present study aims to explore how integration versus prediction related to social information contributes to listening comprehension in autistic children and their non-autistic peers. Seven- to eight-year-old participants (n=9 non-autistic, n=2 autistic) were given a test of listening comprehension through the Understanding Spoken Paragraphs subtest of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals 5th Ed. (CELF-5). Their comprehension performance (measured by proportion of correct responses) was assessed on questions that placed demands on theory of mind skill, as well as either integration or prediction ability. A Wilcoxon’s signed-ranks test indicated no significant difference between integration (M=0.55) and prediction questions (M=0.7) for non-autistic participants (W=11, p=.41, rB=0.47). While there were too few ASD participants to conduct analyses, both participants performed better on integration (M=0.67) than prediction (M=0.33) questions, the opposite trend of what was observed for non-autistic participants. These preliminary results suggest that a continuation of this study, examining group differences in performance across integration and prediction question types is warranted.

Mentor

Meghan Davidson


Comments

Meghan Davidson3 years ago
Excellent presentation, Abby! Can't wait until we get more participants!
•
Symposium™ by ForagerOne © 2026
AboutContact UsTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy