Michigan State University Undergraduate Research and Arts Forum
Symposium by ForagerOne
    Skip navigation
  • arrow_back_ios
    Exit Event
  • Welcome Page
  • Presentations
  • Live Sessions
  • Login
  • Sign Up

401: Using plant and frugivore traits to understand biodiversity across scales and inform conservation


Presenter(s)

Hazel Anderson

Abstract or Description

Global changes like climate change and habitat destruction are threatening species and causing declines in biodiversity. The Neotropical region is predicted to be an area of particularly high risk of extinction and is home to 37% of the world's known plant species. To conserve biodiversity and identify biodiversity hotspot locations, we need to know where biodiversity is highest and most threatened. Plants are essential to ecosystem functioning and understanding their patterns of biodiversity can help identify regions for conservation for numerous species relying on them. Unfortunately, we lack information on plant biodiversity patterns as well as their respective conservation statuses. Knowing how certain plants and their traits are distributed in relation to animals that eat fruits (frugivores) and their traits could help quantify spatial distributions of biotic interactions and map patterns of biodiversity. Most conservation decisions are made based on a simple metric of species richness, but multiple dimensions of diversity should be used to quantify biodiversity as it creates a more holistic picture. This study used already existing big datasets of species occurrence records and functional traits to determine where are the spatial patterns of taxonomic and functional diversity most correlated between plant and frugivore species in the Neotropical country of Ecuador? Quantifying these relationships is important because multiple dimensions of biodiversity can be more comprehensive in identifying conservation priorities.


Comments

Emma McCarthy4 years ago
Awesome presentation, Hazel! I'm wondering if there is a clear reason for a much higher percentage of mammals being assessed by the IUCN than plants. Is it because biologists believe mammals play a more important role than plants and thus prioritize them? Or is it that they are easier to survey? Thanks!
• • 1 comment
Hazel Anderson4 years ago
Hi Emma. I think there are likely a few reasons for this. One being more funding directed towards Mammals than plants. There is also this theory of Plant awareness disparity (also called Plant blindness). It appears that this might be shifting as there has been a recent increase in papers and conversations about the importance of plant conservation. I'd be happy to chat further if you have more questions!
Symposium™ by ForagerOne © 2025
AboutContact UsTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy