Analysis of Inclusivity of Published Science Communication Cirricula for Scientists and STEM Students

Voiceover

Presenter(s)

Rachel McMillan

Abstract or Description

Science communication researchers have outlined various models of how scientists interact with non-scientists – from a linear/deficit-based approach, to a two-way/dialogue-based approach, to a network/inclusion-based approach. Science communication should embrace the more inclusive technique, with a holistic model that incorporates cultural knowledge, values diverse disciplines, considers social contexts, and encourages scientists to co-produce knowledge and solutions with others. However, science communication tends to be inequitably distributed, with only certain voices and perspectives owning the narrative. We hypothesized that a contributing element to this disconnect could be science communication education for scientists and scientists-in-training does not encourage movement towards the more inclusive and interdisciplinary models, but instead relies on more traditional linear models. To address this hypothesis, we analyzed n=82 published science communication training programs. We coded the trainings as promoting a deficit, dialogue, or inclusive model of science communication. We found 40.24% followed deficit, 52.44% followed dialogue, and 7.32% followed inclusive. Training targeted towards undergraduate STEM students was mostly deficit model, while training targeted towards graduate students and scientists was mostly dialogue model. These findings present an opportunity: training for scientists on communication could incorporate more focus on interdisciplinarity, inclusivity, and intersectionality. Additionally, undergraduate students can and should begin their training in science communication with an understanding of inclusivity rather than deficits, which will empower the next generation of scientists to capitalize on their own diverse cultural funds of knowledge as well as promote inclusive science communication practices in their future scientific endeavors. 

Mentor

Dr. Nicole Kelp