The Colorado Science & Engineering Fair
Symposium by ForagerOne
    Skip navigation
  • arrow_back_ios
    Exit Event
  • Welcome Page
  • Presentations
  • Live Sessions
  • Login
  • Sign Up

Attempting to Define Tetration of Non-Integer Heights


Voiceover

Presenter(s) Information(s)

Morgan Holien

Project Category

Sr - Math & Computer Sciences

CSEF Project Number

SR-MCS-002

Optional: Supplementary Materials

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ShQKuUJliAri1CrD3AutSztGH2-cKB1o/view?usp=sharing


https://drive.google.com/file/d/19U2afz8_WbhYRxbIMu35x7Je4fnRktPn/view?usp=sharing

Abstract or Description

Tetration is a fundamental mathematical operation that follows in the sequence of addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. nx is defined as x to the power of itself, n times. Naturally, the question arises: What happens if n is a non-integer? Many generalizations to non-integers have been produced over the history of tetration, all of which fall short in one way or another. As such, there is no universally accepted definition of non-integer tetration. A viable non-integer extension is crucial to the physical application of tetration, as the real world so rarely involves pure integers.


To address this shortcoming, I am attempting to define an extension for non-integer heights that meets all ideal extension requirements. Using the known functional square root of ln(x+1), I was able to show that -3/2(e1/e) ≈ -1.295. Using basic identities, I then calculated e^(1/e) tetrated to other heights, which are consistent with the values produced by other non-explicit methods. Because this derivation was discovered quite recently, I have yet to fully generalize the process, though I have many ideas on how to do so. Additionally, I discovered several new tetrational identities, which may be used to further characterize the behavior of tetration.


With the framework laid, it is only a matter of time before I can derive a complete extension for non-integer tetration. This may ultimately allow the operation to be fully integrated into the study of the natural world.

of 0
Current View
Current View
An error occurred while loading the PDF.

Enter the password to open this PDF file.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Preparing document for printing…
0%

Comments

Frank Augustine1 year ago
A friend and I have been trying to recreate your work and we're are having trouble doing that, but we may not fully understand your terminology. Under the heading "Robbins' Extension", using the terminology exp(e) = e^^2, is s(x,z)n = x^^(n+z)? Also is the delta function the kronecker delta function? Also, the m=1, n and k=0, n-1 subscript/superscript pairs, is that meant to be a summation, or a difference (like in a definite integral), or something else?
•
Symposium™ by ForagerOne © 2025
AboutContact UsTerms of ServicePrivacy Policy